Minor changes
This commit is contained in:
@@ -98,7 +98,6 @@ Secondly, comparing the results across different video content, i.e., different
|
||||
For instance, in the results of Figure~\ref{Figure6:AverageQualityMain}, for Tennis sequence the method \MEXPELTWEN clearly outperforms the remaining ones.
|
||||
However for the BQSquare sequence, higher performance is achieved by using less bitrate (i.e., 10\%) allocated for the \ac{el} (\MEXPELTEN).
|
||||
This is a consequence of the higher quality degradation due to higher motion in Tennis sequence (see results for TI and \ac{mv} size in Table~\ref{Table6:TestMaterialCharacteristics}) which requires higher redundant information to increase the overall quality.
|
||||
%\HIGHLIGHT{Mention SI!!}
|
||||
|
||||
Finally, by comparing the results for all test sequences and both bitrates it can be clearly noticed that the \ac{plr} has a significant impact on the performance of the error robustness techniques. In case of the proposed reference frame selection method (\EXP), quality gains in comparison with the \REF case are achieved for lower loss ratio, i.e., \acs{plr} as low as 2\% for all test conditions. For method \MEXPELTWEN, higher \acs{plr} are required to be able to outperform both the reference \ac{hevc} and the \ac{mve} method.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user